Does anyone make a scanner that doesn't suck?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65a2a/65a2a7773ec8a72de8628601090a2ae44d57a637" alt=""
It's not really the hardware that's the problem. It's the god awful driver software. I had to install an HP scanner the other day and the driver software was a 150MB download! Adobe Photoshop CS3 in it's entirety is 150MB by the way. Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot. I don't need the scanner software to do image editing, cataloging, email, or make slide shows. I just need it to scan the image and send it to the computer quickly and without locking up the whole computer.
What they need to do is make scanners show up as a mass storage device. Memory is cheap these days, just scan the image to some internal memory then I can copy the files over to my computer as easy as copying a file. Have a nice user menu on the front that lets me adjust the DPI and image type and I wouldn't even have to install any software on my computer. If you're feeling fancy you could throw in a setting that could enable/disable auto-cropping and it would be the perfect scanner.
No one buys a scanner because of the software that it comes with so stop adding features, it's just making the quality of your software go down.
2 Comments:
Canon makes the only consumer-grade scanners worth considering. The v700/v750 are very good and the canoscan software does a good job as well.
By
Anonymous, at 11:51 AM CST
Fujitsu ScanSnap. It even launches nuclear missiles and does air traffic control. See:
http://flashweb.com/blog/2008/01/weapons-armed-and-ready.html
By
Walter Jeffries, at 12:57 PM CDT
Post a Comment
<< Home